The eNotes Blog Why You Should Read Stanford’s Mandatory Reading for First Years Homegoing by YaaGyasi

Why You Should Read Stanford’s Mandatory Reading for First Years Homegoing by YaaGyasi Photograph by means of Stanford News Stanford University’s â€Å"Three Books† program urges approaching first years to peruse three chose titles before starting the school year. This year, Homegoing by Yaa Gyasi was picked as one of them. Gyasi’s debut novel subtleties the enduring impacts of subjection, both socially and generationally. It ranges more than three centuries and seven ages starting with two relatives: Effia and Esi in Ghana. Effia weds a white man and moves to the Cape Coast Castle, famous as a slave-exchange focus. Only a couple of floors beneath Effia, her stepsister, Esi, is kept in imprisonment in the castle’s storm cellar and in the long run sold into servitude in America. This sets the remainder of the book moving, intently following the two distinct ancestries. Gyasi remembers a sum of 14 unique characters for the novel, with each distributed one part committed to them. A few sections center around one especially significant period in their life, while others length their entire youth and that's only the tip of the iceberg. While this uneven story is somewhat hard to stay aware of at first, its effect is significant. Through this structure, Gyasi incorporates a few significant notable and social minutes, which would have been unthinkable if she’d picked to restrain the quantity of characters. These significant minutes incorporate the slave exchange, convict renting, the Great Migration, and the Harlem Renaissance, to give some examples. This implies Homecoming peruses less like a novel and progressively like interconnected short stories. Photograph by means of Paperback Paris This account structure not just permits Gyasi to investigate the various authentic encounters of being dark in America, yet it likewise uncovers the resounding impacts of bondage on families in both the United States and Ghana. â€Å"I didn’t need my composition to be about lovely blossoms in a field. I needed to be locked in with the world around me.† Yaa Gyasi Through magnificent narrating, Gyasi makes encounters that transport perusers back in time. For instance, while the subjection parts are not lovely to peruse, they are written in intense detail making a ground-breaking understanding experience. With significant subjects that run from family to race and prejudice, Gyasi doesn't avoid the harder points but instead handles them head-on, making a particular understanding encounter. Gyasi expressed, â€Å"I didn’t need my composition to be about lovely blossoms in a field. I needed to be locked in with the world around me.† In a period of â€Å"fake news† and â€Å"alternative facts,† it is imperative to remember who holds the force in picking which stories are told. As one character, Yaw, discloses to his understudies, â€Å"[W]hen you study history, you should consistently ask yourself, Whose story am I missing? Whose voice was stifled so this voice could approached? When you have made sense of that, you should find that story too.† Homegoing delivers that smothered story, expounding on the overwhelming impacts of subjection from 14 distinctive purpose of perspectives in various timeframes of time. Gyasi features these stifled voices to show the quest for their personalities, their jobs in the public arena, and for a spot they can call home. Peruse the Homegoingâ outline and study control with characters, subjects, and statements. In the event that you delighted in Homegoing by Yaa Gyasi, make certain to check these extra titles: Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates Melody of Solomon by Toni Morrison Americanah by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Karl Marx Essay Essays - Marxist Theory, Marxism, Marxian Economics

Karl Marx Essay Since the beginning cash, riches and capital have directed a lifestyle to the majority. Riches directed the lives that the rich lived and the lives of the poor that worked for and encompassed them. In certain societies your class would never be gotten away throughout everyday life, you needed to sit tight for your next manifestation, while in different societies the possibility of riches rose above a real existence and took into account development starting with one class then onto the next. This is the truth of an entrepreneur society that was first examined by Karl Marx in the nineteenth century. When Karl Marx previously wrote his molding chips away at socialism, he accepted that the connection among laborers and capital would consistently be contradicting. While most dismissed his general speculations, they didn't contend with the essential thought that the interests of laborers would consistently be at chances with those of proprietors. This is one of Marx's just hypotheses that has demonstrated to be valid. As a result, throughout the years, that idea has guided the commercial center as far as choosing compensation, working conditions and other specialist focused advantages. The bourgeoisie (rich/proprietors class), by fast improvement of creation instruments and by ground-breaking methods for correspondence, drew all, even the most immature countries, into human progress through creation. Their quick turn of events and capacity as a rule to misuse the specialist permitted them to get a decent footing in the market. So free enterprise developed into globalization. This is the significant motivation behind why every other framework, socialism notwithstanding, ended up pursuing the possibility of riches through creation. As indicated by Marx, the 'entrepreneur method of creation' is a result of the 'modern upset' and the division of work originating from it. By goodness of this division, Marx's entrepreneur the truth is increasingly parting into two incredible groups straightforwardly confronting each other off; these classes are; the bourgeoisie and the low class. The procedures where the two classes were framed and the setting in which they directly exist have formed their reasoning and the results of their reasoning. As such, the 'human instinct' of the individuals from the two classes is to a great extent molded by their situations inside the two gatherings. Given the conventionalist idea of the human individual, impressive light might be tossed upon the significant highlights of Marx's world by methods for an examination of the sorts of 'human instinct' that he appointed in this monetary hypothesis. In Marx's industrialist reality, division of work is a fundamental condition for ware creation. This division assaults the individual/specialist class at the very foundation of their life with the goal that they are changed over into 'a disabled being'. By the procedure where they are injured they encounters intense estrangement, which characterizes them for eternity. The estrangement as indicated by Marx has a few measurements. In the principal, the specialist is repelled from the demonstration of creation, yet additionally from the results of his work. Next, on the grounds that the laborers exercises have a place with another, to be specific the industrialist, the specialist interprets this division as lost his self. Which conceptually implies that he is antagonizing himself from himself through the demonstration of creation. In the last structure, the distance appears as alienation of one man to another man. Incompletely in light of the fact that the division of work makes a vario us leveled structure among the laborers themselves and halfway for the past explanation that the laborers are the property of the entrepreneur and are viewed as human capital. By and by the non-laborer, the industrialist, is likewise trapped in his own snare of distance. Be that as it may, there is a distinction between the two and how they associate. By prudence of the property relationship of the laborer to non-specialist. The non-specialist in principle does everything against the laborer, which the specialist does against himself; yet he the non-specialist doesn't do against himself what the specialist does to himself. In this way, while the laborer's movement is a torment to himself, the industrialists' action is his methods for help and achievement. Division of work and the human instinct that it has shaped in the entirety of its distanced and devastating structures are, in this way, central and fundamental pieces of the oddity of realities that Marx embedded in his world in regards to private enterprise. Be that as it may, when Marx composed this he didn't understand or represent

Motivational Interviewing as a Treatment for Addiction

Motivational Interviewing as a Treatment for Addiction Addiction Coping and Recovery Methods and Support Print Motivational Interviewing as a Treatment for Addiction By Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Elizabeth Hartney, BSc, MSc, MA, PhD is a psychologist, professor, and Director of the Centre for Health Leadership and Research at Royal Roads University, Canada. Learn about our editorial policy Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Updated on October 01, 2018 E / Getty Images More in Addiction Coping and Recovery Methods and Support Overcoming Addiction Personal Stories Alcohol Use Addictive Behaviors Drug Use Nicotine Use Motivational Interviewing is a therapeutic technique for helping people make changes in their lives, which has been applied effectively to the treatment of addictions. The spirit of Motivational Interviewing is based on three key concepts: collaboration between the therapist and the person with the addiction, rather than confrontation by the therapist; drawing out  the individuals ideas, rather the therapist imposing their ideas; and autonomy of the person with the addiction, rather than the therapist having authority over them. Collaboration vs Confrontation Collaboration is the partnership that is formed between the therapist and the person with the addiction. This partnership is based on the point of view and experiences of the person with the addiction. This contrasts with some other approaches to addictions treatment, which are based on the therapist confronting the person with the addiction, and imposing their point of view about the persons addictive behavior. Collaboration has the effect of building rapport between the therapist and the person with the addiction and allows the person with the addiction to develop trust towards the therapist, which can be difficult in a confrontational atmosphere. This does not mean that the therapist automatically agrees with the person with the addiction. Although the person with the addiction and their therapist may see things differently, the therapeutic process is focused on mutual understanding, not the therapist being right and the person with the addiction being wrong. Drawing Out Rather Than Imposing Ideas The approach of the therapist drawing out the individuals own ideas, rather than the therapist imposing their opinions is based on the belief that the motivation, or wish, to change comes from the person with the addiction, not from the therapist. No matter how much the therapist might want the person to change their behavior, it will only happen if that individual also wants to change their behavior. So it is the therapists job to draw out the persons true motivations and skills for change, not to tell the person with the addiction what to do. Autonomy vs. Authority Unlike some other treatment models that emphasize the doctor or the therapist as an authority figure, Motivational Interviewing recognizes that the true power for making changes rests within the person with the addiction, not within the therapist. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to follow through with making changes happen. This is empowering to the individual, but also gives them responsibility for their actions. How Change Happens in Motivational Interviewing Four guiding principles form the basis of the Motivational Interviewing approach. Although each persons process of overcoming an addiction will be different, the therapist will hold true to these principles throughout each individuals process. These principles are vital to establishing trust within the therapeutic relationship. Empathy and Acceptance People with addictions are often reluctant to go into treatment because they dont believe that the therapist, who, after all, is working to end peoples addictions, will understand why the addictive behavior means so much to them. Many, especially those who have put up with other people criticizing their behavior, believe they will be judged, some even feeling guilty about their behavior and feeling judgment would be valid. But judgment simply is not what Motivational Interviewing is about. Instead of judging the person with the addiction, the therapist focuses on understanding the situation from the addicted persons point of view. This is known as empathy. Empathy does not mean that the therapist agrees with the person, but that they understand and that the individuals behavior makes sense to them (or did at the time the behavior was carried out). This creates an atmosphere of acceptance. Helping People to Make Up Their Minds Motivational Interviewing recognizes that people with addictions are usually ambivalent and uncertain about whether or not they want to change. Their addiction has probably already had consequences  for them, which have brought them into treatment. Yet they have developed their addiction as a way of coping with life, and they do not necessarily like the idea of giving that up.?? Motivational Interviewing helps people to make up their minds about how to move forward through the stages of change, by helping the individual to look at the advantages and disadvantages of different choices and actions. So without pressuring the person, goals and actions can be developed in this trusting, collaborative atmosphere, which is based on the individuals own needs, wishes, goals, values, and strengths. Developing New Understanding Motivational Interviewing as an approach recognizes that change does not always happen easily or just because the individual wants it. It is natural for the person to change their mind many times about whether they want to give up their addiction, and what that process, and their new lifestyle, will look like. Rather than challenging, opposing or criticizing the person with the addiction, the therapist will help the individual to reach a new understanding of themselves and what their addiction means to them. They do this by re-framing and offering different interpretations of situations that come up in the change process, typically which increase the persons motivation to change. All of this is based on the individuals own goals and values, which have already been explored. Being Supportive The therapist will always support the persons belief in their own power to make the changes they want. In the beginning, the therapist may have more confidence in the individual that they have themselves, but this changes with ongoing support. The 9 Best Online Therapy Programs